Legal Opinion
Technical Assistance International, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 4, 1998No. 97-5112PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to determine how much freedom the government has to vary its requirements when it enters into a requirements contract. The government entered into a requirements contract with Technical Assistance International, Inc., (TAI), pursuant to which TAI was to maintain and repair the Army’s vehicle fleet at the White Sands Missile Range. The United States Court of Federal Claims held that when the government increased the rate at which it replaced the older vehicles in the fleet, and thus decreased its requirements for vehicle maintenance and repair…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Big Horn Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison Company, Black Butte Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Empire Gas Corporation v. American Bakeries CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Hml Corporation v. General Foods CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- GAF CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the UNITED STATES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Medart, Inc. v. Richard G. Austin, Administrator, General Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. Applied Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Spectrum Sciences v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Hi-Shear Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- COALITION ON WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR WASTES v. BodmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.