Legal Opinion
Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. Applied Companies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 2, 2003No. 01-1630PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SCHALL. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING.
ORDER
Applied Companies, Inc. (“Applied”) has petitioned for panel rehearing of the court’s December 10, 2002 decision. Rumsfeld v. Applied Companies, Inc., 318 F.3d 1317 (Fed.Cir.2002) (“Applied”).
This suit arises out of a requirements contract between the Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”), a component of the Department of Defense, and Applied. Under the contract, during the specified period, DLA was to purchase from Applied all of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- California Federal Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Larson Manufacturing Co. of South Dakota, Inc. v. Aluminart Products Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Hi-Shear Technology Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Minh-Vu Hoang v. Hewitt Avenue Associates, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.