Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Robert Andrew HUFF, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 283502

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 2015No. A14-24PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case involves the question of whether we should impose reciprocal discipline on respondent Robert Andrew Huff, who recently lost his license to practice law in Illinois by order of the Illinois Supreme Court. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (the Director) petitioned this court to impose the same discipline on Huff in Minnesota under Rule 12(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), which governs reciprocal-discipline proceedings in Minnesota. Because we conclude that the disciplinary proceedings in Illinois were fundamentally fair…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PerezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against FarleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. In Re Reinstatement of TrygstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against MorinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Don Richard John BauermeisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. In re Disciplinary Action against SklarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Don Richard John BauermeisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Don Richard John BauermeisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API