Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Keller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 2003No. C0-01-1051PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In July 2001, this court suspended Michael E. Keller from the practice of law because a petition for disciplinary action had been filed against him and he could not be found in the state. In September 2002, the North Dakota Supreme Court disbarred Keller for misappropriation of client funds, unauthorized practice of law, failure to communicate adequately with his clients and other violations of the North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct. On October 7, 2002, we issued an Order to Show Cause why Keller should not be disbarred. Because Keller did not respond to the Order to Show Cause…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LaChapelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against StrobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against KossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against VaughtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. In re Disciplinary Action against SklarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API