Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Roff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 2, 1998No. C4-96-2090PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In September 1996, the Arizona Supreme Court disbarred Douglas E. Roff for misappropriation of client funds, trust account violations, failure to adequately protect his clients’ interests after his suspension, and failure to cooperate with attorney discipline proceedings. The Director of the Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility then petitioned this court for the reciprocal discipline of Roff in Minnesota. However, the director was unable to locate Roff, so in January 1997 we ordered Roff suspended and gave him one year to move to vacate the order. That year has…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against MorinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RuttgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against MeadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against FahrenholtzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API