Legal Opinion
Building Industry Assn. of Central California v. City of Patterson
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 2009No. F054785PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAWSON, J.
Morrison Homes, Inc. (Developer), obtained a development agreement and tentative subdivision maps for the construction of two residential subdivisions in Patterson, California. At the time those documents were approved, the City of Patterson (City) 1 allowed developers to pay a fee of $734 per house in lieu of building affordable housing. About three years later, City increased this fee to $20,946 per house and sought to apply the increased fee to Developer’s two residential projects among others.
Developer sued City claiming that the increased fee violated (1) its vested…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Ehrlich v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Trinity Park, L.P. v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- 616 Croft Ave., LLC v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Cal Building Indus. etc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013