Legal Opinion
Ehrlich v. City of Culver City
California Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1996No. S033642PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARABIAN, J.*
This case comes to us by a circuitous route, having been remanded after the United States Supreme Court issued a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal and vacated that court’s judgment in favor of defendant City of Culver City. The high court’s order of remand directed the Court of Appeal to reexamine its prior judgment “in light of Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) 512 U.S. 374 [129 L.Ed.2d 304, 114 S.Ct. 2309]. . . .” (Ehrlich v. City of Culver City (1994) 512 U.S. _ [129 L.Ed.2d 854, 114 S.Ct. 2731].)
Following remand, a divided Court of Appeal reaffirmed its earlier…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Garneau v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- San Remo Hotel L.P. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.