Legal Opinion
616 Croft Ave., LLC v. City of West Hollywood
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 23, 2016No. B266660PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUI, J.—
Plaintiffs Shelah and Jonathan Lehrer-Graiwer and 616 Croft Ave., LLC (collectively Croft), appeal from a superior court order denying their petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the City of West Hollywood (the City) to return fees the City collected when Croft applied for building permits. Croft argues the City’s collection of the fees was invalid (1) facially under the due process clause of the United States Constitution and (2) “as applied” because the City did not bear its burden in proving the fees were “reasonably related” to the deleterious public impact caused by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ehrlich v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- San Remo Hotel L.P. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hamilton and High LLC v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Hamilton and High, LLC v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023