Legal Opinion

North River Insurance v. Endicott

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1986No. Docket 83681PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCynar, J.

On September 25, 1984, plaintiff, North River Insurance Company, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment seeking a determination that it was not required to defend or indemnify the defendant, its insured, in a probate court action for an accounting brought by a third party. On February 21, 1985, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was granted pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(3), now MCR 2.116(0(10). Defendant appeals as of right.

Defendant, Paul Endicott, is a certified public accountant. In December, 1972, defendant acquiesced to the request of a personal friend and became a trustee of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Stein v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Illinois Employers Insurance v. DragovichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Brooks v. ReedMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Allstate Insurance v. DempsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
  2. Ratcliffe v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Upjohn Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991
  4. Michigan Township Participating Plan v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. Telephone Alarm Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API