Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Reed

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1979No. Docket 78-3254PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P.J.

This is an automobile no-fault case. Plaintiffs appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The background facts are fully set forth in the dissenting opinion.

A motion for summary judgment which is based on GCR 1963, 117.2(3) is designed to test whether there is factual support for a claim. Crowther v Ross Chemical & Manufacturing Co, 42 Mich App 426; 202 NW2d 577 (1972).

When passing upon a motion under this subrule, the court must consider the pleadings, affidavits, depositions, admissions and other documentary evidence then available to it. Rizzo v Kretschmer, 389…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Crowther v. Ross Chemical and Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Partrich v. MuscatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. McKendrick v. PetrucciMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hollowell v. Career Decisions, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. McGhee v. GMC Truck & Coach Division, General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Deaner v. Utica Community School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API