Legal Opinion

Stein v. Continental Casualty Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1981No. Docket 78-5270PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, P. J.

Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking a judgment declaring that defendant was obligated under certain provisions of an architects and engineers professional liability insurance policy to defend a suit brought against plaintiffs by Bank of Lansing and to pay any judgment that might be rendered in favor of the Bank of Lansing. See Bank of Lansing v Stein, Hinkle, Dawe & Associates Architects, Inc, 100 Mich App 719; 300 NW2d 383 (1980). The defendant insurance company appeals as of right from a judgment and order entered in favor of plaintiffs.

In 1964, plaintiffs Richard Frank and Morris…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. MERCHANTS IND. CORP., OF NY v. EgglestonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. May v. United Services Ass'n of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Harts v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sobotor v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API