Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomas Solvent Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided April 14, 1988No. K85-415PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

On September 11,1987,1 filed an opinion and order granting plaintiff USF & G’s motion for clarification and reconsideration. The September 11th opinion essentially returned this case to the status quo prior to August 7, 1987. See Opinion filed September 11, 1987 in K85-415.

Presently before me is that portion of USF & G’s motion for summary judgment filed March 5, 1987 which seeks a declaratory judgment with respect to the duty to defend issue as to the “General Liability Policy Issuers” 1 and the “Automobile Policy Insurers.” 2 USF & G originally moved for a…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, a Michigan and Indiana Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Tom L. Ashlock v. Conseco Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hazen Paper Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API