Legal Opinion

Ratcliffe v. International Surplus Lines Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 16, 1990No. 1-88-0739PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE DiVITO

delivered the opinion of the court;

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking a declaration of coverage under two insurance policies, a trustees errors and omissions policy (the Trustees policy) underwritten by defendant International Surplus Lines Insurance Company (ISLIC), and a directors and officers liability and company reimbursement liability policy (the D & 0 policy) underwritten by defendant International Insurance Company (International), both secured by the same broker, defendant Johnson & Higgins of Illinois, Inc. (Johnson & Higgins). Plaintiffs sought…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Campbell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. McCormick v. McCormickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Mooney v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. McCormick v. McCormickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Methodist Medical Center of Illinois v. American Medical Security IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Level 3 Communications, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. McAninch v. WintermuteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Mt. Airy Insurance v. ThomasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Smith v. NeumannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API