Legal Opinion
Thompson Construction Corp. v. Dormitory Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.
In this action for a permanent injunction (referred to as such in plaintiff’s brief at page 1), plaintiff moves for a temporary injunction and defendant Dormitory Authority of the State of New York cross-moves for summary judgment.
The material facts are not in dispute. This is obvious from plaintiff’s brief which states: “ There is absolutely no dispute among the three parties as to the facts in this action ’ ’, and from that of defendant Hambly Construction Co., Inc., which reads: “ None of the facts of this case are controverted.” If no material issue of fact is presented and the record…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Forstmann v. Joray Holding Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Braun v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1952
- Goodwill Advertising Co. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Dormitory Authority of New York & Span Electric Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Marino v. Town of RamapoNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- TM Park Avenue Associates v. PatakiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Clintwood Manor, Inc. v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Dormitory Authority v. Gruzen PartnershipNew York Supreme Court · 1992