Legal Opinion
Baumann v. Baumann
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 1929PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
The plaintiff has secured a declaratory judgment which adjudges that she is the lawful wife of the defendant Charles Ludwig Baumann; that the defendants are not and never have been husband and wife; that an alleged divorce procured by the defendant Charles Ludwig Baumann from the plaintiff in Yucatan, Mexico, is null and void and that an alleged marriage between the defendants on June 28th, 1926, is null and void. The findings and evidence justify the judgment to that extent.
On a prior appeal in this case the Appellate Division decided that this was a proper case for a declaratory judgment to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Atkinson v. John E. Doherty & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Rosenbaum v. RosenbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Gleason v. GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Fischer v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Garvin v. GarvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.