Legal Opinion

Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1947PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

“ Owney ’*’ Madden was named by one Frank Costello in 1943 as a bookmaker with whom he placed bets. “ Coley ” Madden, plaintiff herein, a self-styled “ patron of the races ”, was barred by defendant from its Aqueduct Race Track in 1945, under the mistaken belief that he was Costello’s bookmaker. Plaintiff thereupon sought a declaratory judgment declaring that he has a right, as citizen and taxpayer — upon paying the required admission price — to enter the race course and patronize the pari-mutuel betting there conducted. Defendant, on the other hand, asserted an unlimited power of exclusion.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Woollcott v. . ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Western Turf Assn. v. GreenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. People v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Aaron v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Marrone v. Washington Jockey ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. Stuyvesant Town Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Flores v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Jacobson v. New York Racing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. George Hadges v. Yonkers Racing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. People v. LicataNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API