Legal Opinion
TM Park Avenue Associates v. Pataki
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1997No. 1:95-cv-01480PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
MeAVOY, Chief Judge.
I. Background
A. Procedural history
Plaintiff TM Park Avenue Associates’ (“TM”) initiated this action against the State of New York, numerous state entities and various state officials both in their official and individual capacities. TM contends, inter alia, that a New York statute, Chapter 312 of the Laws of 1995, violates the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution, as it substantially impairs TM’s long-term lease with the State University of New York (“SUNY”).
Now before this Court are three summary judgment motions. First, TM moves…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- TADCO Construction Corp. v. Dormitory AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Schallop v. New York State Department of LawDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Hayut v. State University of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- TM Park Avenue Associates v. PatakiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Rochester Fund Municipals v. Amsterdam Municipal Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.