Legal Opinion

Dormitory Authority v. Gruzen Partnership

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stephen G. Crane, J.

Plaintiff, the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (Dormitory Authority), has moved for a trial preference pursuant to CPLR 3403 (a) (1). Plaintiff claims it is entitled to a preference under CPLR 3403 (a) (1) as a "board of officers of the state.” Third-party defendant, Ewell W. Finley, P. C. *877(Finley), argues that the suit has not been brought by "any such 'board’ but by the Dormitory Authority itself,” and the Dormitory Authority is not entitled to a preference because it is a public benefit corporation, separate and distinct from the State.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Methodist Hospital v. State Insurance FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In re the Arbitration between Dormitory Authority of New York & Span Electric Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Ciulla v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  4. Skakandy v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Skakandy v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API