Legal Opinion

Freas v. Sullivan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1936No. 25461PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stephenson; J.

The parties here stand in an order the reverse of that held in the trial court, and they will be referred to in this opinion as they appeared in the style of the case in the Court of Common Pleas, namely, Sullivan will be referred to as plaintiff and Freas as defendant.

Under the general allegations of error assigned in this court, it becomes necessary to consider the assignments of error made in the Court of Appeals. There were six assignments of error urged in the Court of Appeals, namely:

1. In submitting the issue of wanton misconduct to the jury;

2. Error in the general charge…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Galliano v. East Penn Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Kerper v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Minnich v. Easton Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Biro Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ando v.WoodberryNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Litsinger Sign Co. v. American Sign Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Moats v. Metropolitan Bank of LimaOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lyons v. LyonsOhio Supreme Court · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API