Moats v. Metropolitan Bank of Lima
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbest, J.
The issue before us is whether Ohio or Pennsylvania substantive law should be applied under the facts above-stated.
Prior to this court’s decisions in Fox v. Morrison Motor Freight (1971), 25 Ohio St. 2d 193, 267 N. E. 2d 405, and Schiltz v. Meyer (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 169, 280 N. E. 2d 925, it was well established in Ohio that the substantive law of the place where the injury occurred was controlling in cases such as the one at bar. The rule of lex loci delicti prevailed. Freas v. Sullivan (1936), 130 Ohio St. 486, 200 N. E. 639; Collins v. McClure (1944), 143 Ohio St. 569, 56 N. E. 2d 171;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fox v. Morrison Motor Freight, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- Schiltz v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Freas v. SullivanOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Village of Clarington v. AltharOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Collins v. McClureOhio Supreme Court · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Morgan v. Biro Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. NicholsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. GeraldoOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Barnes Group, Inc. v. C & C Products, Inc., and Roy E. McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.