Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Biro Manufacturing Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 84-518PublishedCited by 175 opinions

1Per curiam

Through this appeal, the court is confronted with the standard choice-of-law dilemma. We must initially determine whether Kentucky or Ohio law should be applied to the facts as presented. Then we must proceed to the merits of appellant’s case under the appropriate state standards.

I

The principles of choice-of-law have been subject to much reevaluation in many jurisdictions due to the judiciary’s dissatisfaction with the absolute nature of the traditional rules. This flurry of activity has brought about inconsistent theories which oftentimes lead to unjust results. Many problems still plague…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Fox v. Morrison Motor Freight, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Moats v. Metropolitan Bank of LimaOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Lyons v. LyonsOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Schiltz v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by175 opinions

  1. Angela M. Phelps v. John D. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Townsend v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re Bendectin Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. PV Ex Rel. TV v. Camp JayceeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  5. Tommy Morris v. Salvatore NuzzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API