Legal Opinion

Knox v. Simmerman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1930No. Appeal, 184PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

At the time in question, the defendant, George H. Simmerman, a practicing physician of Philadelphia, had a winter home at Clermont, Florida, at which the plaintiff, Andrew Knox, also a practicing physician of Philadelphia, was a guest. On the afternoon of February 18, 1927, the two physicians and a mutual friend were returning from the Plymouth Country Club on a paved highway of ample width, called the Mt. Dora Road, in an automobile known as a coupé, owned and driven by the defendant. As they approached a curve the coupé, failing to make the turn, dashed into a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shafer v. Lacock, Hawthorn & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. King Et Al., Appellants, v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Conroy v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Cody v. VenzieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Dept. of Transp. v. Manor Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Kotal v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Balla v. SladekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Bender v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API