Vandegrift v. Riley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The petitioner, as state director of finance, seeks a writ of mandate to compel the respondent state controller to audit and approve six' demands transferring certain amounts from the emergency fund to the funds of the departments in whose favor the demands are drawn. The demands may be briefly referred to as follows:(1) For salary and expenses of chief of division of service and supply, for the eighty-fifth fiscal year, $6,500.(2) For the support of the bureau of commerce, '$2,415.(3) For additional expenses of conference of governors, $3,000.(4) For the division of narcotic enforcement,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Verdier v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Riley v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Board of Fish & Game Commissioners v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Irelan v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Estate of KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Vater v. County of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Tirapelle v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.