Board of Fish & Game Commissioners v. Riley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
The petitioner herein seeks a writ of mandate to compel the respondent .as state controller to approve and draw his warrant for the claim of the petitioner for the sum of $301.56, which, according to the petitioner’s contention, is now payable out of the fish and game preserva tion fund. The facts upon which the petitioner’s said claim is predicated and which are not disputed on'this proceeding are as follows: In the year 1909 the state legislature (Stats. 1909, p. 392) adopted an act providing for the creation of a special fund to be kept in the state treasury and be applicable to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Riley v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Riley v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Railroad Commission v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Board of Osteopathic Examiners v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Jamme v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- California Association for Safety Education v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Daugherty v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- California Radioactive Materials Management Forum v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- STATE TRIAL ATTORNEYS'ASSN v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Vandegrift v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.