Legal Opinion
Riley v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 15062PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioners have applied for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent State Treasurer to publish notice, as required by Statutes of 1933, chapter 605, that a certain registered warrant is now redeemable as to both principal and interest. One of the petitioners is the State Controller and the other is the owner and holder of the warrant in question." The petition alleges that on November 1, 1933, the Controller duly and regularly drew and signed the warrant in question, directing the Treasurer to pay out of the general fund in the state treasury the sum of $6.77 to F. W. Baude,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- People ex rel. McCullough v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Rhea v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- State Ex Rel. Toomey v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Bickerdike v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- California Association for Safety Education v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Kelley v. Baldwin, Auditor GeneralSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Raymond v. ChristianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Vandegrift v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.