City & County of San Francisco v. Boyd
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
By this proceeding in mandamus the city and county of San Francisco and its Public Utilities Commission seek to compel respondent, as controller of the city and county, to audit and approve wage claims of certain motormen, conductors, streetcar operators and bus operators employed by the municipal railway at the rates of compensation fixed in the Salary Standardization Ordinance (Ordinance # 2184), effective July 1, 1943, and in the Annual *688Salary Ordinance for the year 1943-1944 (Ordinance # 2148), also effective July 1, 1943. In support of his refusal to audit and draw warrants for these…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Reyes v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.