Hessian v. Ervin

Stone, Justice.

Seeking a judgment declaring the unconstitutionality of L. 1929, c. 191, 3 Mason Minn. St. 1938 Supp. § 25á-l, et seq., plaintiff got one to the contrary and appeals.

There was a trial below, and the case is before us on the decision of the judge. The challenged act is entitled:

“An act to establish a State Employes Retirement Fund, to authorize deductions from salary therefor and the payment of annuities and benefits therefrom, to provide for the management of said fund by a retirement board, and to define the powers and duties of such board.”

Its scope is pretty Avell indicated…