Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Holton v. City of Tampa

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 24, 1934PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

Holton, a retired fireman of the City of Tampa, obtained from this Court an alternative writ of mandamus commanding the respondents, City of Tampa, and its officials named therein, to pay to him the sum of $1,062.50, alleged to be due relator as a pensioner of the City of Tampa up to November 1, 1933. Respondents have moved to quash the alternative writ on the ground that Chapter 16721, Acts 1933, lawfully reduced the relator’s pension to $100.00 a month, instead of the $312.50 per month that relator claims is due under the particular law under which he was retired.

The applicable statutes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Pennie v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People Ex Rel. Donovan v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Aitken v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. McBride v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Luellen v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Phillip v. Public School Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Driggs v. Utah Teachers Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1943

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API