Bank v. . Bank

It is the accepted position "that for the purpose of presenting the legal questions involved, a demurrer is construed as admitting relevant facts, well pleaded, and ordinarily relevant inferences of fact, readily deducible therefrom, but the principle does not extend to admitting conclusions or inferences of law," etc. Board of Health v. Comrs.,173 N.C. 250-253, citing Pritchard v. Comrs.,126 N.C. 908913; Hopper v. Covington, 118 U.S. 148-151;Equitable Assurance v. Brown, 213 U.S. 25, and other cases.

While there are general averments of negligence and proximate cause imputing liability to the…