Walsh v. Hunt
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. John Reynolds, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Action to foreclose a mortgage. The findings show that defendant, who resided in San Francisco, hut owned certain premises in San Jose upon which there was a *48mortgage for five hundred dollars, some time prior to October 3, 1893, authorized one Hughes, a real estate agent and notary-public in San Jose, to negotiate a loan of five hundred dollars on said premises, at a rate of interest not to exceed eight per cent per annum, with the proceeds of which to pay off said mortgage; that, being notified by Hughes that he had found a person willing to make the loan, defendant, on October 3, 1893, went…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Angle v. North-Western Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Wood v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Holmes v. TrumperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Knoxville National Bank v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Burns v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Otis Elevator Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Schumann v. Bank of California, N. A.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Copelin v. Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.