Holmes v. Trumper
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw Circuit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOhristiancy, J.
This was an action brought by Holmes against Trumper upon a promissory note signed by the latter, which note was partly printed and partly in writing, a printed blank haying been used.
The following is a copy of the body of the note as it appeared upon the trial, the portions in italics being printed and the other portions written, viz:
“ $400.
“One year after date I promise to pay to Lyman Terry or bearer, four hundred dollars, at the First National Bank of Ann Arbor, value received, with interest at 10 per cent, [signed] Jacob Trumper.”
There was evidence on the part of the defendant tending to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bruce v. WestcottNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Visher v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Isnard v. TorresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
- Fisher v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by47 opinions
- Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- New York Iron Mine v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Walsh v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Salazar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Sievers v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1899
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.