Legal Opinion

Lindley v. Yeatman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1955No. 313PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnsoN, J.

A demurrer to a complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action admits the truth of every material fact properly alleged. Gaines v. Long Mfg. Co., 234 N.C. 331, 67 S.E. 2d 355; Bryant v. Ice Co., 233 N.C. 266, 63 S.E. 2d 547. See also Scott v. Veneer Co., 240 N.C. 73, 81 S.E. 2d 146. However, it is to be noted that on demurrer only facts properly pleaded are to be considered, with legal inferences and conclusions of the pleader to be disregarded. Shives v. Sample, 238 N.C. 724, 79 S.E. 2d 193; Bank v. Gahagan, 210 N.C. 464, 187 S.E. 580; Brick Co. v. Gentry,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Brick Co. v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Scott v. Statesville Plywood & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  5. Ideal Brick Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clemmons v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Hall v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Wright v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Lewis v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API