Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Dunn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 11, 1955No. 456PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The plaintiff’s motion to strike was treated as a demurrer ore tenus and was allowed on the ground that the new matter set up in each of the further defenses alleges no valid defense. The procedure followed has the sanction of this Court. Jenkins v. Fields, 240 N.C. 776, 83 S.E. 2d 908; Williams v. Hospital Asso., 234 N.C. 536, 67 S.E. 2d 662; Bank v. Hill, 169 N.C. 235, 85 S.E. 209. However, the rule is that a motion to strike allegations of an answer for failure to state a defense should not be granted if the allegations state any fact, or combination of facts, which, if true, entitle the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gaylord v. GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Bowen v. DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Gaylord v. . GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Williams v. North Carolina State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Williams v. North Carolina State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API