Legal Opinion

Ballinger v. . Thomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 25, 1928PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J

after stating the ease: The office of a demurrer is to test the sufficiency of a pleading, admitting, for the purpose, the truth of the allegations of fact contained therein, and ordinarily relevant inferences of fact, necessarily deducible therefrom, are also admitted, but the principle does not extend to the admissions of conclusions or inferences of law. S. v. Bank, 194 N. C., 436; Brick Co. v. Gentry, 191 N. C., 636, 132 S. E., 800.

It is provided by 3 C. S., 513, that when a demurrer is filed to a complaint, the plaintiff may be allowed to amend, so as to obviate the necessity…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Village of Carterville v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API