Riddle v. Pitts
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
In this action for fraud in the sale of an automobile, appellant Pitts appeals from a jury verdict of $13,000 actual damages and $3,000 punitive damages which was reduced by the trial judge to $8,000 actual damages and $3,000 punitive damages.
Section 56-15-110 of the 1976 S. C. Code of Laws mandates double recovery of actual damages and permits punitive damages up to three times actual damages for a willful violation. We affirm the $3,000 award of punitive damages but reduce actual damages to $2,000.
Appellant first alleges the trial judge erred in failing to bind respondent to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- King v. North River Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- Griffith v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holloman v. McAllisterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Schnellmann v. RoettgerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Beck v. ClarksonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Tant v. Dan River, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Gamble v. PriceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.