Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Pitts

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 26, 1984No. 22187PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

In this action for fraud in the sale of an automobile, appellant Pitts appeals from a jury verdict of $13,000 actual damages and $3,000 punitive damages which was reduced by the trial judge to $8,000 actual damages and $3,000 punitive damages.

Section 56-15-110 of the 1976 S. C. Code of Laws mandates double recovery of actual damages and permits punitive damages up to three times actual damages for a willful violation. We affirm the $3,000 award of punitive damages but reduce actual damages to $2,000.

Appellant first alleges the trial judge erred in failing to bind respondent to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. North River Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Griffith v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holloman v. McAllisterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Schnellmann v. RoettgerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Beck v. ClarksonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Tant v. Dan River, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Gamble v. PriceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API