Legal Opinion
Holloman v. McAllister
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 9, 1986No. 22560PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
This action for a declaratory judgment involves permissive use under the omnibus clause of an automobile insurance policy. The Circuit Court denied State Farm Mutual Insurance Company’s (State Farm’s) motions for summary judgment and directed verdict.
We affirm.
Gloria McAllister (McAllister), while driving an automobile belonging to James Harrison (Harrison) and insured by State Farm, struck and killed a child pedestrian. Willie Holloman (Holloman), as administrator of the child’s estate, brought a wrongful death action against McAllister. He received a default judgment of $22,000 and brought…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Talmadge v. TalmadgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- All-States Leasing Co. v. Pacific Empire Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Allstate Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Cooper v. Firemen's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. DriverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.