Legal Opinion

Schnellmann v. Roettger

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 7, 2007No. 26327PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners have filed a petition for a writ of certiorari asking this Court to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Schnellmann v. Roettger, 368 S.C. 17, 627 S.E.2d 742 (Ct.App. 2006). We grant the petition only as it pertains to whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding petitioners’ reliance on respondent’s representation was not justifiable and whether the Court of Appeals applied the correct measure of damages in a fraud case. We dispense with further briefing and affirm as modified the decision of the Court of Appeals.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Respondent acted as the real…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Reid v. Harbison Development CorporationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Starkey v. BellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Byrn v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Schnellmann v. RoettgerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Hollman v. WoolfsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Linares-Acevedo v. AcevedoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  4. Allegro, Inc. v. ScullyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Richland County v. Carolina Chloride, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API