Legal Opinion

Tant v. Dan River, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 16, 1986No. 22575PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari to review a portion of the decision of the Court of Appeals reported at 286 S. C. 140, 332 S. E. (2d) 534 (Ct. App. 1985). We reverse.

Homeowners (petitioners) brought suit against Dan River, Inc., (respondent) for negligence in permitting its boiler system to emit a black sooty material which damaged their homes and property. A jury awarded the homeowners actual and punitive damages. The Court of Appeals reversed the awards of punitive damages, finding there was no evidence to warrant submission of punitive damages to the jury. We disagree.

In reviewing a motion for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Hammond v. Cummins Engine Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Rhodes v. LawrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Riddle v. PittsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Tant v. Dan River, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ravan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Cartee v. LesleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Norton v. Opening Break of Aiken, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Norton v. Opening Break of Aiken, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Bethea v. Pedro Land, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API