Legal Opinion

King v. North River Insurance Company

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 22, 1982No. 21809PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This is an appeal from a directed verdict granted respondent North River Insurance Company. We reserve and remand for a new trial.

Appellants contracted with respondent for fire insurance coverage on appellant’s warehouse. The contract contained a provision insuring the property against damage caused by vandalism or malicious mischief, for which respondent collected an extra premium. The contract defines vandalism or malicious mischief as “only the wilful and malicious damage to or destruction of the property covered.”

The roof of the warehouse collapsed following a heavy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whisenant v. James Island CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Wilkes CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Livaditis v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. AzarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Stephens v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Cudd v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Georgitsi Realty, LLC v. Penn-Star Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Griffin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API