Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 13, 1938No. 14791PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

On January 24, 1936, the respondent, upon the solicitation of Mr. Andrews, an agent of the appellant, signed an application for a policy of insurance on the life of her minor son, Ernest G. Griffith, and paid the agent the sum of .twenty-five cents, which was to be treated as a deposit and later applied in payment of the first weekly premium in the event the policy should be issued. She was given a receipt, acknowledging the payment o.f this premium deposit, which stipulated that if the application should be rejected the deposit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Hampton & Branchville R. & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Trowbridge v. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Ott v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riddle v. PittsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Bessie A. Spires v. North American Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Banahan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. McPherson v. United American InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API