Legal Opinion

Ali M. Shire v. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., Crosstown Surgery Center, and Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, Intervenors.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 2016No. A15-856PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Justice.

This appeal requires us to interpret an exception to the general rule that an employee injured in the course of employment is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. Specifically, an employer is not liable for injuries incurred by an employee while participating in an employer-sponsored “voluntary recreational program[ ],” MinmStat. § 176.021, subd. 9 (2014). The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) concluded that an employee-recognition event sponsored by relator was not “voluntary” because attendance at the event was the only option by which respondent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  4. Matter of Welfare of A. J. B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  5. Nina Wilson v. Mortgage Resource Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API