Legal Opinion
Burkstrand v. Burkstrand
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 30, 2001No. C0-00-813PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
This case presents the question of whether the expiration of the hearing time frames prescribed by the Domestic Abuse Act, specifically MinmStat. § 518B.01, subdivision 7(c) (2000), divests the district court of subject matter jurisdiction to hold a hearing on a petition for an order for protection. The court of appeals determined that the district court erred, as a matter of law, in issuing an order for protection for appellant Linda Rae Burkst-rand because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hold a hearing on her petition outside the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Doe v. MadonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Handicraft Block Ltd. Partnership v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Kite v. KiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Cox v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.