Matter of Welfare of A. J. B.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
THISSEN, Justice.
This case requires us to determine whether two Minnesota statutes- Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(6) (2018), the stalking-by-mail provision, and Minn. Stat. § 609.795, subd. 1(3) (2018), known as the mail-harassment statute-are unconstitutional under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The juvenile court and the court of appeals concluded that both statutes are constitutional. We hold that Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(6), is facially overbroad and not subject to either a narrowing construction or severance of unconstitutional provisions. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lewis Alan Dugan v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Christian Action League of MN v. Mike FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- in Interest of R.DSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- Thomas Styczinski v. Grace ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
- Fredin v. MiddlecampDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.