Legal Opinion
Schatz v. Interfaith Care Center
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 11, 2012No. A11-1171PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Relator, Andrea A. Schatz, who was employed by Interfaith Care Center, was injured in a work-related accident in Minnesota, and then moved to Wyoming where she received medical treatment. The Wy*648oming medical providers submitted their charges to New Hampshire Insurance Company, the employer’s workers’ compensation insurer. Relying on Minn.Stat. § 176.136, subd. lb(d) (2010), the insurer made payments in the amount provided under the workers’ compensation benefit structure in Wyoming. Schatz filed a workers’ compensation medical request for the unpaid balance, arguing…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Ali M. Shire v. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., Crosstown Surgery Center, and Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. BergstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In re the Welfare of J.J.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.