Legal Opinion
State v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 12, 2014No. A12-0071PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*435OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
Appellant Larry Allen Nelson challenges his felony conviction under Minn.Stat. § 609.375, subds. 1, 2a(l) (2012), which criminalizes a person’s omission and failure “to provide care and support” to a spouse or child when legally obligated to do so. Nelson argues that the record contains insufficient evidence to support his conviction because the State did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he omitted and failed to provide care to his children. Because we conclude that Minn.Stat. § 609.375 (2012) (“the care-and-support statute”) required the State to prove that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Carcieri v. SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Ali M. Shire v. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., Crosstown Surgery Center, and Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Renee Anita VaskoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.