Legal Opinion
Hudjohn v. S&G MACHINERY CO.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 22, 2005No. 01-02-40656; A121002PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants in this personal injury action, raising several assignments of error. Defendants counter with a battery of cross-assignments of error, including a contention that the trial court erred in denying defendants’ motion for a directed verdict based on the legal insufficiency of plaintiffs proof of medical causation. As explained below, we agree with defendants that the trial court so erred. See Chouinard v. Health Ventures, 179 Or App 507, 512, 39 P3d 951 (2002). Accordingly, we affirm.
In reviewing the denial of a motion for directed verdict, we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Chouinard v. Health VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Joshi v. Providence Health System of Oregon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- DeNucci v. HenningsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Phelps v. Wyeth, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- American Federation of Teachers-Oregon v. Oregon Taxpayers United PacCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Douglas Medical Center, LLC v. Mercy Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Preble v. Centennial Sch. Dist. No. 287Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.