Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.
Plaintiff brought this negligence action against Wal-Mart, Inc. (defendant), after one of defendant’s employees injured plaintiff by bumping into her and knocking her to the floor. The jury considered three specifications of negligence and returned a general verdict in plaintiffs favor. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case for a new trial, holding that one of plaintiffs specifications did not state a claim for negligence under Oregon law and that defendant, therefore, was entitled to a new trial under the “we can’t tell” rule that this court announced in Whinston v. Kaiser…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- G. L. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- H. E. Culbertson Co. v. WardenOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Heino v. HarperOregon Supreme Court · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. PineOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Wallach v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2008
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.