Legal Opinion

Chouinard v. Health Ventures

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 13, 2002No. 16-96-11470; A109103PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants for medical malpractice. The trial court directed a verdict in defendants’ favor because the jury could not reasonably infer that defendants’ breach of the standard of care caused plaintiffs injuries. We affirm.

We state the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Wheeler v. LaViolette, 129 Or App 57, 60, 877 P2d 665 (1994). Plaintiff has a history of migraine headaches. In September 1993, she visited her physician, Dr. Pugsley, and reported that she had recently experienced disorientation and scattered thinking in addition to headaches. Pugsley attributed the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hammond v. Central Lane Communications CenterOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Curtis v. MRI IMAGING SERVICES IIOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Fehely v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Philibert v. KluserOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Joshi v. Providence Health System of Oregon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Simons v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  5. Phelps v. Wyeth, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API