Legal Opinion
DeNucci v. Henningsen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 8, 2012No. C071949CV; A142059PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
Plaintiff brought a civil action against Washington County Deputy Sheriff Henningsen and Washington County, asserting that Henningsen had arrested her without probable cause. Plaintiffs claim against defendant Henningsen, brought pursuant to 42 USC section 1983, was that he violated her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures. Plaintiffs claim against defendant Washington County was for the tort of false arrest.
A jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s grant of defendants’ motion in limine and instruction of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Peterson v. McCAVICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Guirma v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Price v. City of SutherlinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- State v. GranberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.