Legal Opinion

Stout v. Porritt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1930No. Docket No. 14, Calendar No. 34,616PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of a land contract. Defendants filed cross-bill, asking that the contract be declared void for various reasons.

On January 29, 1925, Donald Porritt, as administrator of the estate of Addie L. Dutton, deceased, executed to plaintiff a six months’ option to purchase a 110-acre farm on land contract for $15,000, the down payment to be $5,000. It is conceded that the option was of no legal effect. However, on July 29th, plaintiff telegraphed Donald Porritt an acceptance of the option and stated the down payment had been deposited in a bank. The property was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rothstein v. WeeksMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Adler v. KatusMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Griefen v. HubbardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  4. Stub v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Wayne Woods Land Co. v. BeemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shull v. SextonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Bradley v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Haugland v. CantonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Alexander v. WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Jones v. McGivernSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API